Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME  |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS     IIIS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 


ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Indexed by
EBSCO, Cabell, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 10.000.000 Academics)


Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org

 

Editorial Advisory Board

Journal's Reviewers
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology


How to Learn Multidisciplinary Ideas
Shigehiro Hashimoto
(pages: 1-7)

The HY-DE Model: An Interdisciplinary Attempt to Deal with the Phenomenon of Hyperattention
Erzsebet Dani
(pages: 8-14)

Open up or Close down - The new Era of “Openneers” and how they lead the Way to Future Success
Manuel Moritz, Tobias Redlich, Pascal Krenz, Sonja Buxbaum-Conradi, Sissy Basmer-Birkenfeld, Jens P. Wulfsberg
(pages: 15-22)

Developing Global Competency across the Disciplines: An Interdisciplinary Project
Madelyn Flammia, Houman Sadri
(pages: 23-27)

Knowledge Management Systems as an Interdisciplinary Communication and Personalized General-Purpose Technology
Ulrich Schmitt
(pages: 28-37)

Work Integrated Learning - a Marriage Between Academia and Working Life
Martin Gellerstedt
(pages: 38-46)

Alexander von Humboldt's Idea of Interconnectedness and its Relationship to Interdisciplinarity and Communication
Detlev Doherr
(pages: 47-51)

A Philosophy of Learning
Jeremy Horne
(pages: 52-56)

Fostering Innovation in Higher Education through Entrepreneurial Leadership
Ronald A. Styron Jr.
(pages: 57-61)

Informational Urbanism
Wolfgang G. Stock
(pages: 62-69)

A Silent Revolution in Reflexivity
Karl H. Müller
(pages: 70-81)

Innovative Approaches to Building Comprehensive Talent Pipelines: Helping to Grow a Strong and Diverse Professional Workforce
R. Cherinka, J. Prezzama
(pages: 82-86)

The Multiple Faces of Reflexive Research Designs
Karl H. Müller
(pages: 87-98)

Towards a New Cybernetic Interdisciplinary Approach to Pedagogic Challenge
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 99-104)

The Use of Narrative Medicine Literature for Interdisciplinary Communication through the Internet Learning System
Ya-Huei Wang, Pan-Fu Kao, Hung-Chang Liao
(pages: 105-115)

The Interdisciplinary Business Doctorate for Executives: A Novel Way to Bridge Academic Research and Practice
T. Grandon Gill, Matthew Mullarkey
(pages: 116-121)

Concept Mapping and Knowledge Modeling: A Multi-Disciplinary Educational, Informational, and Communication Technology
John W. Coffey
(pages: 122-128)

Multi-Disciplinary Research Experiences Integrated with Industry –Field Experiences
Suzanne Lunsford, Corrie Spradlin, Mary Sullivan, Phuong Khanh Quoc Nguyen
(pages: 129-131)

Consulting Informs Best Practice in Academia
Risa Blair
(pages: 132-133)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Unveiling the Domain Conflict – FOSS vs. IPR

Dr. Anurika Vaish, Dr. Shveta Singh, Mr. Abhishek Vaish


In the present times the most talked about issues in the knowledge driven economic system are Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) & Intellectual Property Right (IPR), both of which exist at poles apart. The question that prevails that is about the relevance of the either and that of the dominance of each one. The paper tries to probe into issues of general and specific relevance of FOSS and IPR as suppliers of certain set of utility and benefit to the user. It will also check the validity of the claim of FOSS and it licensing procedure comparing it with the user ship obligations of IPR protected products and services. The premise to the paper is that both FOSS and IPR have to exist and compliment each other ensuring a strong presence of resources in the public and private domain. The paper would certainly work on the area to validate the existence of conflict between the FOSS and IPR, or it is a mere false caution raised by groups pursuing either cause. Finally the paper would propose to demarcate the areas of dominance of FOSS and IPR and prove the utility at the socio-economic front.

Full Text