Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Education 5.0: Using the Design Thinking Process – An Interdisciplinary View
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 1-17)

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Smart Cities
Mohammad Ilyas
(pages: 18-39)

A Multi-Disciplinary Cybernetic Approach to Pedagogic Excellence
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 40-63)

Data Management Sharing Plan: Fostering Effective Trans-Disciplinary Communication in Collaborative Research
Cristo Ernesto Yáñez León, James Lipuma
(pages: 64-79)

From Disunity to Synergy: Transdisciplinarity in HR Trends
Olga Bernikova, Daria Frolova
(pages: 80-92)

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Future Business World
Hebah Y. AlQato
(pages: 93-104)

Wi-Fi and the Wisdom Exchange: The Role of Lived Experience in the Age of AI
Teresa H. Langness
(pages: 105-113)

Older Adult Online Learning during COVID-19 in Taiwan: Based on Teachers' Perspective
Ya-Hui Lee, Yi-Fen Wang, Hsien-Ta Cha
(pages: 114-129)

Data Visualization of Budgeting Assumptions: An Illustrative Case of Trans-disciplinary Applied Knowledge
Carol E. Cuthbert, Noel J. Pears, Karen Bradshaw
(pages: 130-149)

The Importance of Defining Cybersecurity from a Transdisciplinary Approach
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 150-164)

ChatGPT, Metaverses and the Future of Transdisciplinary Communication
Jasmin (Bey) Cowin
(pages: 165-178)

Trans-Disciplinary Communication for Policy Making: A Reflective Activity Study
Cristo Leon
(pages: 179-192)

Trans-Disciplinary Communication in Collaborative Co-Design for Knowledge Sharing
James Lipuma, Cristo Leon
(pages: 193-210)

Digital Games in Education: An Interdisciplinary View
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 211-230)

Disciplinary Inbreeding or Disciplinary Integration?
Nagib Callaos
(pages: 231-281)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Nascent Cybernetics, Humanism, and Some Scientistic Challenges

Zachary M. Mabee


I argue in this paper that certain broad programmatic concerns offered by Norbert Wiener regarding the then-nascent field of cybernetics help us to see how the field has a certain kind of implicitly humanistic orientation. I take this orientation to be emergent or manifest in regard both to its interdisciplinarity and, in particular, to the way in which it highlights the need for not-just-scientific values to be at play in the evaluation and reception of its work. I marshal these points in response to some key recent varieties of scientism, namely those defended, respectively, by Alex Rosenberg and by James Ladyman, Don Ross, and David Spurrett, which have been philosophically resurgent of late. I contend that a humanistic approach to the sciences, following generally upon Wiener’s cautionary points, escapes some obvious problems that ultimately beset varieties of scientism, particularly relating to the role that various values often play in and around scientific work.

Full Text