Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


A Sign Language Learning Application for Children with Hearing Difficulties
Kuniomi Shibata, Akira Hattori, Sayaka Matsumoto
(pages: 1-6)

An Experience Mapping Method for Delayed Understanding in STEM Education
Masaaki Kunigami, Takamasa Kikuchi, Takao Terano
(pages: 7-16)

Refining the Art of Judgment Education: Evaluation of an Educational Case Study on Making Judgments About the Pros and Cons of COVID-19 Vaccination During the Pandemic
Ariyoshi Kusumi, Yasukazu Hama
(pages: 17-22)

A New Digital Culture in Architecture and Engineering Design Classes with Technological Advances
Mozart Joaquim Magalhães Vidigal, Renata Maria Abrantes Baracho, Marcelo Franco Porto
(pages: 23-28)

Using Federated Learning for Collaborative Intrusion Detection Systems
Matteo Rizzato, Youssef Laarouchi, Christophe Geissler
(pages: 29-36)

Design and Development of an Application for the Generation of Garment Patterns Based on Body Measurements Using CNN
Geraldine Curipaco, Jeiel Tarazona, Daniel Subauste
(pages: 37-46)

Data-Driven Security Measurements to Improve Safety in NYC and NJ Mass Transit
Nithya Nalluri, Michael Bsales, Christie Nelson
(pages: 47-55)

A Review on Security and Privacy of Smart Cities
Abdulhakim Alsaiari, Mohammad Ilyas
(pages: 56-62)

Use of Audience Response Systems to Enhance Student Engagement in Online Synchronous Environments: An Exploratory Study
Trevor Nesbit, Angela Martin
(pages: 63-68)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Volunteer vs. Professional Management of Academic Conferences: A Comparison of Five Meetings

James Spee


Academic conferences operate under a range of models from nearly all volunteer to a mix of volunteer and professional event management. This paper compares the event management practices of five conferences: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Conference (OBTC), The Western Academy of Management (WAM), The North American Case Research Association (NACRA), The Academy of Management (AOM), and The Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management (IBAM) The analysis will examine the mix of volunteer and professional management used to organize and operate the annual meeting of each organization separate from the program content; such as reserving the hotel, ordering meals, and offering special group events. Along a continuum, OBTC uses the least professional event management and IBAM uses the most. The other organizations fall somewhere in between. Professional event managers who organize conferences on a repeated basis have a distinct advantage over volunteers who change jobs every year, thereby losing large amounts of experiential learning. The all-volunteer organizations justify their choice of amateur event managers on the basis of lower up-front cost and "preserving our culture," but neglect to account for the wide variations in performance, lack of accountability, and burnout that can come with use of volunteers.

Full Text