Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Education 5.0: Using the Design Thinking Process – An Interdisciplinary View
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 1-17)

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Smart Cities
Mohammad Ilyas
(pages: 18-39)

A Multi-Disciplinary Cybernetic Approach to Pedagogic Excellence
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 40-63)

Data Management Sharing Plan: Fostering Effective Trans-Disciplinary Communication in Collaborative Research
Cristo Ernesto Yáñez León, James Lipuma
(pages: 64-79)

From Disunity to Synergy: Transdisciplinarity in HR Trends
Olga Bernikova, Daria Frolova
(pages: 80-92)

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Future Business World
Hebah Y. AlQato
(pages: 93-104)

Wi-Fi and the Wisdom Exchange: The Role of Lived Experience in the Age of AI
Teresa H. Langness
(pages: 105-113)

Older Adult Online Learning during COVID-19 in Taiwan: Based on Teachers' Perspective
Ya-Hui Lee, Yi-Fen Wang, Hsien-Ta Cha
(pages: 114-129)

Data Visualization of Budgeting Assumptions: An Illustrative Case of Trans-disciplinary Applied Knowledge
Carol E. Cuthbert, Noel J. Pears, Karen Bradshaw
(pages: 130-149)

The Importance of Defining Cybersecurity from a Transdisciplinary Approach
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 150-164)

ChatGPT, Metaverses and the Future of Transdisciplinary Communication
Jasmin (Bey) Cowin
(pages: 165-178)

Trans-Disciplinary Communication for Policy Making: A Reflective Activity Study
Cristo Leon
(pages: 179-192)

Trans-Disciplinary Communication in Collaborative Co-Design for Knowledge Sharing
James Lipuma, Cristo Leon
(pages: 193-210)

Digital Games in Education: An Interdisciplinary View
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 211-230)

Disciplinary Inbreeding or Disciplinary Integration?
Nagib Callaos
(pages: 231-281)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Organizational Institutions and Their Responsible Behavioral-Cultural Gene Codes and A Measurement for Organizational Efficiency

Jason Jixuan


This essay has two goals. The first is to classify two different types of organizational institutions from the four-dimensional system-thinking perspective, and to identify the relationship between such organizational institutions and their relevant behavioral-cultural gene codes embedded within their (P-)individuals. Unlike the popular belief that authoritarian or totalitarian institutions are caused by ideologies or created/dominated by tyrannical leaders, the author defines a concept of behavioral-cultural gene code and extends the application of self-organization theory to suggest that behavioral-cultural gene codes carried by the members of the organization are responsible for the formation of, either democratic or authoritarian, institutions. Therefore, transformation of an authoritarian organization into a democratic one, no matter at the level of groups, of business enterprises, or of a government, must start from transforming behavioral-cultural gene codes. The second goal is to define Organizational Friction Coefficient for capturing the characteristics of these two types of organizational institutions, thus adding clarity to the widely used concept of organizational efficiency in the contexts of both business organizations and systems of government.

Full Text