Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.
Indexed byDOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world. Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO . DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable. DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable. Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility. DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles. JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar
Listed inCabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics Re-Published in
Academia.edu
Analogical and Logical Thinking – In the Context of Inter- or Trans-Disciplinary Communication and Real-Life Problems Nagib Callaos , Jeremy Horne (pages: 1-17) Artificial Intelligence for Drone Swarms Mohammad Ilyas (pages: 18-22) Brains, Minds, and Science: Digging Deeper Maurício Vieira Kritz (pages: 23-28) Can AI Truly Understand Us? (The Challenge of Imitating Human Identity) Jeremy Horne (pages: 29-38) Comparison of Three Methods to Generate Synthetic Datasets for Social Science Li-jing Arthur Chang (pages: 39-44) Digital and Transformational Maturity: Key Factors for Effective Leadership in the Industry 4.0 Era Pawel Poszytek (pages: 45-48) Does AI Represent Authentic Intelligence, or an Artificial Identity? Jeremy Horne (pages: 49-68) Embracing Transdisciplinary Communication: Redefining Digital Education Through Multimodality, Postdigital Humanism and Generative AI Rusudan Makhachashvili , Ivan Semenist (pages: 69-76) Engaged Immersive Learning: An Environment-Driven Framework for Higher Education Integrating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration, Generative AI, and Practice-Based Assessment Atsushi Yoshikawa (pages: 77-94) Focus On STEM at the Expense of Humanities: A Wrong Turn in Educational Systems Kleanthis Kyriakidis (pages: 95-101) From Disciplinary Silos to Cyber-Transdisciplinary Networks: A Plural Epistemic Model for AGI-Era Knowledge Production Cristo Leon , James Lipuma (pages: 102-115) Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence): What Is It? & What Are Its Inter- And Transdisciplinary Applications? Richard S. Segall (pages: 116-125) How Does the CREL Framework Facilitate Effective Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Experiential Learning Through Role-Playing? James Lipuma , Cristo Leon (pages: 126-145) Narwhals, Unicorns, and Big Tech's Messiah Complex: A Transdisciplinary Allegory for the Age of AI Jasmin Cowin (pages: 146-151) Playing by Feel: Gender, Emotion, and Social Norms in Overwatch Role Choice Cristo Leon , Angela Arroyo , James Lipuma (pages: 152-163) Responsible Integration of AI in Public Legal Education: Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities in Albania Adrian Leka , Brunilda Haxhiu (pages: 164-170) The Civic Mission of Universities: Transdisciplinary Communication in Practice Genejane Adarlo (pages: 171-175) The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education James Lipuma , Cristo Leon (pages: 176-182) They Learned the Course! Why Then Do They Come to Tutorials? Russell Jay Hendel (pages: 183-187) To Use or Not to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Solve Terminology Issues? Ekaterini Nikolarea (pages: 188-195) Transdisciplinary Supersymmetry: Generative AI in the Vector Space of Postdigital Humanism Rusudan Makhachashvili , Ivan Semenist (pages: 196-204) Why Is Trans-Disciplinarity So Difficult? Ekaterini Nikolarea (pages: 205-207)
ABSTRACT
Influence of Combination of Criteria for Extraction of Features on the Classification of Biological Signals
Expert doctors use the shape of the principal components of the Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potential (BSAEP) signal to diagnose patients with multiple sclerosis. The diagnosis involves the estimation of the effects of the disease on the form of the waveform components of BSAEPs. Since these components are localized in time and frequency a packet wavelet decomposition of the signal is used to compress it. The information obtained by the packed wavelet can be use to feed artificial neural networks (ANN) with Radial Basis Functions for the same purpose of obtaining a diagnosis. Due to the paucity of data, the signals must be preprocessed. From the hundreds or thousands of wavelet coefficients, only eight are selected using different criteria. Those are used to train an artificial neural network with radial basis functions. We have found that if we combine some of the selection criteria to differentiate sick and healthy people, only one combination of criteria provided better results that using each criterion alone, and other combinations worked better only with some wavelet bases.
Full Text
