Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


Analogical and Logical Thinking – In the Context of Inter- or Trans-Disciplinary Communication and Real-Life Problems
Nagib Callaos, Jeremy Horne
(pages: 1-17)

Artificial Intelligence for Drone Swarms
Mohammad Ilyas
(pages: 18-22)

Brains, Minds, and Science: Digging Deeper
Maurício Vieira Kritz
(pages: 23-28)

Can AI Truly Understand Us? (The Challenge of Imitating Human Identity)
Jeremy Horne
(pages: 29-38)

Comparison of Three Methods to Generate Synthetic Datasets for Social Science
Li-jing Arthur Chang
(pages: 39-44)

Digital and Transformational Maturity: Key Factors for Effective Leadership in the Industry 4.0 Era
Pawel Poszytek
(pages: 45-48)

Does AI Represent Authentic Intelligence, or an Artificial Identity?
Jeremy Horne
(pages: 49-68)

Embracing Transdisciplinary Communication: Redefining Digital Education Through Multimodality, Postdigital Humanism and Generative AI
Rusudan Makhachashvili, Ivan Semenist
(pages: 69-76)

Engaged Immersive Learning: An Environment-Driven Framework for Higher Education Integrating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration, Generative AI, and Practice-Based Assessment
Atsushi Yoshikawa
(pages: 77-94)

Focus On STEM at the Expense of Humanities: A Wrong Turn in Educational Systems
Kleanthis Kyriakidis
(pages: 95-101)

From Disciplinary Silos to Cyber-Transdisciplinary Networks: A Plural Epistemic Model for AGI-Era Knowledge Production
Cristo Leon, James Lipuma
(pages: 102-115)

Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence): What Is It? & What Are Its Inter- And Transdisciplinary Applications?
Richard S. Segall
(pages: 116-125)

How Does the CREL Framework Facilitate Effective Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Experiential Learning Through Role-Playing?
James Lipuma, Cristo Leon
(pages: 126-145)

Narwhals, Unicorns, and Big Tech's Messiah Complex: A Transdisciplinary Allegory for the Age of AI
Jasmin Cowin
(pages: 146-151)

Playing by Feel: Gender, Emotion, and Social Norms in Overwatch Role Choice
Cristo Leon, Angela Arroyo, James Lipuma
(pages: 152-163)

Responsible Integration of AI in Public Legal Education: Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities in Albania
Adrian Leka, Brunilda Haxhiu
(pages: 164-170)

The Civic Mission of Universities: Transdisciplinary Communication in Practice
Genejane Adarlo
(pages: 171-175)

The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
James Lipuma, Cristo Leon
(pages: 176-182)

They Learned the Course! Why Then Do They Come to Tutorials?
Russell Jay Hendel
(pages: 183-187)

To Use or Not to Use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Solve Terminology Issues?
Ekaterini Nikolarea
(pages: 188-195)

Transdisciplinary Supersymmetry: Generative AI in the Vector Space of Postdigital Humanism
Rusudan Makhachashvili, Ivan Semenist
(pages: 196-204)

Why Is Trans-Disciplinarity So Difficult?
Ekaterini Nikolarea
(pages: 205-207)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Nonparametric Comparison of Two Dynamic Parameter Setting Methods in a Meta-Heuristic Approach

Seyhun HEPDOGAN, Reinaldo Moraga, Gail DePuy, Gary Whitehouse


Meta-heuristics are commonly used to solve combinatorial problems in practice. Many approaches provide very good quality solutions in a short amount of computational time; however most meta-heuristics use parameters to tune the performance of the meta-heuristic for particular problems and the selection of these parameters before solving the problem can require much time. This paper investigates the problem of setting parameters using a typical meta-heuristic called Meta-RaPS (Metaheuristic for Randomized Priority Search.). Meta-RaPS is a promising meta-heuristic optimization method that has been applied to different types of combinatorial optimization problems and achieved very good performance compared to other meta-heuristic techniques. To solve a combinatorial problem, Meta-RaPS uses two well-defined stages at each iteration: construction and local search. After a number of iterations, the best solution is reported. Meta-RaPS performance depends on the fine tuning of two main parameters, priority percentage and restriction percentage, which are used during the construction stage. This paper presents two different dynamic parameter setting methods for Meta-RaPS. These dynamic parameter setting approaches tune the parameters while a solution is being found. To compare these two approaches, nonparametric statistic approaches are utilized since the solutions are not normally distributed. Results from both these dynamic parameter setting methods are reported.

Full Text