Journal of
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
HOME   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   RELATED PUBLICATIONS   |   SEARCH     CONTACT US
 



ISSN: 1690-4524 (Online)


Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.

Indexed by
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)Benefits of supplying DOAJ with metadata:
  • DOAJ's statistics show more than 900 000 page views and 300 000 unique visitors a month to DOAJ from all over the world.
  • Many aggregators, databases, libraries, publishers and search portals collect our free metadata and include it in their products. Examples are Scopus, Serial Solutions and EBSCO.
  • DOAJ is OAI compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically harvestable.
  • DOAJ is OpenURL compliant and once an article is in DOAJ, it is automatically linkable.
  • Over 95% of the DOAJ Publisher community said that DOAJ is important for increasing their journal's visibility.
  • DOAJ is often cited as a source of quality, open access journals in research and scholarly publishing circles.
JSCI Supplies DOAJ with Meta Data
, Academic Journals Database, and Google Scholar


Listed in
Cabell Directory of Publishing Opportunities and in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory


Published by
The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics


Re-Published in
Academia.edu
(A Community of about 40.000.000 Academics)


Honorary Editorial Advisory Board's Chair
William Lesso (1931-2015)

Editor-in-Chief
Nagib C. Callaos


Sponsored by
The International Institute of
Informatics and Systemics

www.iiis.org
 

Editorial Advisory Board

Quality Assurance

Editors

Journal's Reviewers
Call for Special Articles
 

Description and Aims

Submission of Articles

Areas and Subareas

Information to Contributors

Editorial Peer Review Methodology

Integrating Reviewing Processes


How Does Logical Dynamics Assist Interdisciplinary Education and Research in Addressing Cognitive Challenges?
Mengqin Ning, Jiahong Guo
(pages: 1-6)

Inter-Corrective Meta-Dialogue on Constructive Impact of Trans-disciplinary Communication in Modern Education
Vinod Kumar Verma
(pages: 7-9)

Intergenerational Learning for Older and Younger Employees: What Should Be Done and Should Not?
Gita Aulia Nurani, Ya-Hui Lee
(pages: 10-15)

On the Ontological Notion of Education
Jeremy Horne
(pages: 16-24)

Research-Based Learning in Intergenerational Dialogue and Its Relationship to Education
Sonja Ehret
(pages: 25-29)

Role-Playing in Education: An Experiential Learning Framework for Collaborative Co-design
Cristo Leon, James Lipuma, Sirimuvva Pathikonda, Rafael Arturo Llaca Reyes
(pages: 30-38)

The Emergent Role of Artificial Intelligence as Tool in Conducting Academic Research
Bilquis Ferdousi
(pages: 39-46)

The Impact of Cybernetic Relationships Between Education and Work-Based Learning
Birgit Oberer, Alptekin Erkollar
(pages: 47-51)

The Notions of Education and Research
Nagib Callaos, Jeremy Horne
(pages: 52-62)

Towards Sustainable Legal Education Reform: Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Approaches in Albania's Justice System
Adrian Leka, Brunilda Haxhiu
(pages: 63-67)

Transdisciplinary Research and the Gift Economy
Teresa Henkle Langness
(pages: 68-75)


 

Abstracts

 


ABSTRACT


Information Warfare: Memes and their Attack on the Most Valued Critical Infrastructure—the Democratic Institution Itself

Marc Dupuis, Andrew Williams


Social media has become a potent vector for the spread of disinformation. Content initially posted by bots, trolls, or malicious actors is often picked up and magnified by ordinary users, greatly extending its influence and reach. In order to combat disinformation online, it is important to understand how users interact with and spread this type of content, unwittingly or not. We studied patterns in the sharing of propaganda and disinformation on social media through political image-based memes. Initially, we began with a selection of 12 memes. In our first survey, we narrowed this down from 12 memes to six based on the responses received with respect to the message it was trying to convey and representation of varying viewpoints along the ideological spectrum. Ultimately, we chose a selection of six memes. Four of them involved climate-change with two considered left-leaning and the other two right-leaning, and the remaining two were focused on particular politicians and also split along ideological lines. Next, we conducted a second survey in order to better understand the behavior of ordinary users as they interact with propaganda and disinformation on social media. Particular attention was paid to differences based on political affiliation and psychological factors, including personality and trait affect. Negative types of affect appear to dominate the level of engagement Republicans and Independents have with memes, while positive types of affect and extraversion do the same for Democrats.

Full Text