Peer Reviewed Journal via three different mandatory reviewing processes, since 2006, and, from September 2020, a fourth mandatory peer-editing has been added.
This paper is focused in the interpretation of a Case Study results.
This Case Study was based in an article, of the same author of this
paper, presented in an international congress (IMCIC 2015) held in
Orlando - Florida / USA in March of 2015. This article obtained the
Best Paper Award (http://www.iiis.org/bestpapers.asp?year=2015)
of the Technical Session which it was presented in IMCIC 2015.
Besides to have been included in IMCIC 2015 proceedings, as a
complementary award, this same article was published in an
Academic Journal.
The 2 (two) main points of this Case Study were:
1. Evaluate if the capture of the data to register in the
Formulary proposed, by the IMCIC 2015 article, was easy
or had some difficulties;
2. Evaluate the accuracy between the data captured, under the
rules of the IMCIC 2015 article proposal, and the reality
found in 9 (nine) Organizations that were involved in this
Case Study survey.
